Index Funds Outperform Actively Managed Funds
In case you needed one more argument for investing in low-cost index funds, The Wall Street Journal just released data indicating that index funds have been outperforming actively managed funds 92 percent of the time, over the last fifteen years.
That particular story is behind a paywall, but the six-minute podcast version is not:
“This is another blow to managers of stock funds who try to actively select the best stocks,” the WSJ’s Daisy Maxey explains. “They haven’t been doing well.”
The WSJ notes that some active fund managers do meet their benchmarks, though it is “very difficult for active managers to sustain” those benchmarks over time—even in the bull market of the past eight years.
Index funds, meanwhile, have been doing very well. Just make sure you choose a low-cost index fund, so you don’t lose too much of your money to fees.
The debate between passive and actively managed funds still “rages on,” as the WSJ puts it, and maybe it does.
But the data, in this case, clearly comes down on one side of the debate.
Support The Billfold