What Children’s Literature Teaches Us About Money: Louise Fitzhugh’s ‘Harriet the Spy’
“I GUESS IT’S NOT MONEY THAT MAKES PEOPLE DULL.”
Before we get into the money aspect, I want to note that I have always had a huge problem with the second half of Harriet the Spy. I have a vague memory of not even finishing the book, the first time through, because the second half seemed unfair to the half that had come before it.
During the first half of the book, we watch Harriet learn more about herself and the world around her by pretending to be a spy and, more importantly, keeping a notebook/diary about her daily observances. I love that part. It’s brilliant and heartbreaking (and, in my case, familiar) to watch Harriet study both adults and peers to learn about love and loss—and, of course, money.
During the second half of the book, Harriet’s friends create a game of “knock books out of hands” tag so that they can steal her notebook, which they then read. Then they bully Harriet—they literally parade up and down the street, mocking her—and all of the adults insist that this is Harriet’s fault; at the least, she brought it on herself.
That in itself seems children’s-booky enough to slide (the whole “adults don’t understand what’s really going on” thing is a pretty common trope, plus I guess kids should learn that taking notes on their friends during school might have some consequences) but then we get this bizarre sequence where the adults decide to “cure” Harriet’s subsequent and legitimate depression by making her an editor of the school paper, where she runs a gossip column cribbed entirely from what she hears at the family dinner table, and nobody tells her why that might not be the best idea?
The parts where Ole Golly writes Harriet to tell her that sometimes you have to lie to spare your friends’ feelings, and Harriet’s subsequent decision to use her editorial access to print a retraction, are lovely:
THIS PAGE WISHES TO RETRACT CERTAIN STATEMENTS PRINTED IN A CERTAIN NOTEBOOK BY THE EDITOR OF THE SIXTH GRADE PAGE WHICH WERE UNFAIR STATEMENTS AND BESIDES WERE LIES.
But I’ve never really liked the turns the book takes to get there.
Like Harriet, I was a diarist from a young age; I’ve always found that the best way to understand my thoughts and feelings are to write them out, and in many ways that’s why my current job feels invigorating rather than exhausting. The scene where Harriet’s teachers forbid her from carrying a notebook and she worries that she’ll lose access to her own mind is painful to read because it is true.
Like Harriet, I am also an observer, and this book is full of gifts for the observant; think of Sport’s father, alone in his bedroom, letting out a sudden groan—and then Harriet noticing a single athletic sock on Sport’s father’s bedroom’s floor. (We’ll discuss Sport and his father in full later.)
I’m also very much into routine, and eating the same things every day, and eating cake every day if I can get away with it. I love tomato and mayonnaise sandwiches.
But I never fully identified with Harriet as a child, first because I was the kind of young girl who would have loved putting on a black velvet dress every Friday to go to dancing school, and second because she was always louder and less polite than I wanted to be.
I identify much more with her now.
Let’s start, like the book does, with Ole Golly. I am guessing that Ole Golly is a little bit younger than I imagined she was as a child. She’s probably younger than I am. (Today, she’d be a Millennial.)
She is the book’s moral center—it’s not a coincidence that everyone starts treating each other less well after she leaves the narrative—and she is also the person who begins to teach Harriet about money and privilege:
“Now, Harriet, look around you,” Ole Golly said sternly as she poured the tea. “I brought you here because you’ve never seen the inside of a house like this. Have you ever seen a house that has one bed, one table, four chairs, and a bathtub in the kitchen?”
But we quickly learn that Harriet has seen that kind of a house before. She’s come across houses like that on her spy route, where she’s been writing her own thoughts about money and privilege and what it means to be an adult. (When Ole Golly tells Harriet, later on, that Harriet has grown up enough to not need her anymore, this is one of the reasons why.)
This particular house is Ole Golly’s mother’s house, and it becomes clear why Ole Golly is both so well-read and so obsessed with education and individual responsibility: she saw that as a way to make a better life for herself. For a young woman in the 1960s, education would be the first step towards better financial opportunities. A good job, maybe as a live-in nanny in a respectable upper-middle-class home, would be the second. Marriage would be the third.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t trust Mr. Waldenstein one bit. He’s not the kind of person I want Ole Golly to marry. I am instinctively repulsed by his sob story of how he was miserable in his high-paying, demanding job, so the only thing to do was leave his wife and son (technically, “invite them to come with him”) and become a delivery driver.
Maybe there’s a universe here where he, like Captain Awkward suggests, has a series of conversations with his wife about his dissatisfaction with his work, and the two of them discuss different options he could take. Maybe he did all of that and they agreed that the best option was for him to leave. Maybe he didn’t unilaterally make a decision that affected his entire family. Maybe he won’t someday do the same to Ole Golly.
On the subject of demanding jobs:
“Your father has a very high-pressure job, that’s all.
“What’s a high-pressure job?
“It means he’s not allowed to do exactly what he wants with the job, and what he is allowed to do he isn’t given enough time to do it in.”
I love the scene where Harriet’s mother tells Harriet that school is her work, just like the office is Harriet’s father’s work, and Harriet asks what work her mother does—to which her mother responds “A lot of unseen, unappreciated things. That’s not the point.”
We know that the Welsch family has both a cook and an Ole Golly, so it’s easy to assume Harriet’s observation that her mother doesn’t do any “work” is correct. But Harriet’s mother both manages the staff and negotiates on their behalf—she’s the one arguing in favor of giving the cook a raise—and she also assists her husband’s entertainment industry career by dressing up and accompanying him to parties, which happen often enough that Harriet treats them as a regular occurrence.
Skipping that white-tie event is not an option. Behaving inappropriately during the event—or neglecting to talk to the right people—is not an option. Harriet’s mother does a lot of unseen, unappreciated things.
Harriet’s best friend Sport also does his share of unappreciated tasks, although they are much more visible to Harriet: he does the majority of the household cooking and cleaning while his father works (or doesn’t work, depending on the situation), and he even manages the household budget:
“I mean, see, my father gets a check, and if I don’t take it, then the next day it’s gone and he just throws up his hands and goes in his room and shuts the door. Then we don’t eat.”
“Really. This way I take the check and I cash it and I plan what to do with all the money piece by piece and then we have enough to eat. See?”
“Yeah. That’s very sensible.”
Sport’s Cinderella story gets its fairy-tale ending (sort of) when his father sells his novel for a lot of money, and they celebrate that the big check has finally arrived. (I say “sort of” because we never really see Sport easing up on the cooking and the chores. Which, I mean, of course kids should do chores, but this is a seriously parentified childhood he’s got here.)
The problem is that you need more than one big check to make a long-term living in the creative world. Sport and Harriet never really discuss why her father is successful in his creative field and his father is not, but it’s pretty clear that money in the television industry and money in the publishing industry are two different things.
Let’s hope that novel is a bestseller, and that Sport’s the one who gets to budget the royalties.
Sport’s mother, like Mr. Waldenstein’s wife, “went away and has all the money.” I’d love to read the whole story there.
Is there a specific financial lesson to be learned from reading Harriet the Spy? Harriet gets close to it when she makes this observation during one of her spying sessions:
I GUESS IT’S NOT MONEY THAT MAKES PEOPLE DULL. THERE IS A LOT I DON’T KNOW ABOUT THIS THING OF BEING DULL. I BETTER FIND OUT BECAUSE I MIGHT BE IT.
But the real lesson of this book—the one that Harriet writes down long before she has to learn the tedious lesson of “how to lie to your friends after they violate your privacy”—is this:
OLE GOLLY SAYS THERE IS AS MANY WAYS TO LIVE AS THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THE EARTH AND I SHOULDN’T GO ROUND WITH BLINDERS BUT SHOULD SEE EVERY WAY I CAN. THEN I’LL KNOW WHAT WAY I WANT TO LIVE AND NOT JUST LIVE LIKE MY FAMILY.
It’s clear that Ole Golly was talking about herself here, and her journey out of the tiny house with the bathtub in the kitchen. But Harriet’s eleven, and she assumes Ole Golly is talking about her. The advice still holds.
Next week: Anastasia at Your Service.
- What Children’s Literature Teaches Us About Money: Eleanor Estes’ ‘The Hundred Dresses’
- What Children’s Literature Teaches Us About Money: Patricia MacLachlan’s ‘Sarah, Plain and Tall’
- What Children’s Lit Teaches Us About Money: ‘From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler’
- What Children’s Literature Teaches Us About Money: Roald Dahl’s ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’
- What Children’s Literature Teaches Us About Money: Ellen Raskin’s ‘The Westing Game’
Support The Billfold