Have You Ever Noticed There Aren’t a Ton of Poor People in The New York Times

NYT public editor Margaret Sullivan addressed the paper’s coverage of poverty in her Saturday column. Her verdict: “The Times’s coverage of poverty strikes me as a paradox. It is both top-notch and too occasional. Improving that is not impossible.”
Specific complaints she addressed:
• The “special occasion quality” of poverty coverage (usually at the holidays);
• That “poverty coverage does not have the regularity or the inclusive tone of Times coverage on the opposite end of the affluence spectrum”;
• What the Times hasn’t covered (“If you read [NYC’s non-english language newspapers] and the New York Times metro coverage for a while, you’d think they were reporting on two entirely different cities.”)
Her suggestion for improving would be to assign a reporter or two to poverty coverage. Like the one who is currently assigned to the Hamptons. For Hamptons coverage. Of the Hamptons.
Support The Billfold
The Billfold continues to exist thanks to support from our readers. Help us continue to do our work by making a monthly pledge on Patreon or a one-time-only contribution through PayPal.
Comments